Beneath the Blackboards: When Justice Forgot the Teachers of Kolkata
Kolkata’s streets, always alive with honking horns and hurried footsteps, now carry the weight of quiet despair. In front of the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC), what was once just another government building has turned into a battleground of broken promises. The people gathered here are not agitators by trade—they are teachers, professionals who once carried chalk and textbooks, now holding placards and hope worn thin.
This storm began in 2016, with the State Level Selection Test (SLST)—a competitive exam meant to uphold the ideals of merit and fairness. But what unfolded in the years that followed unraveled those very principles. Accusations of favoritism, fraud, and manipulation riddled the recruitment process. And now, in 2025, the Supreme Court has invalidated the appointment of nearly 26,000 teachers and staff, citing a corrupted process.
Yet, the tragedy isn't in the exposure of corruption—it’s in the indiscriminate punishment that followed. Among those stripped of their posts are individuals who did everything right: studied, qualified, worked hard, and trusted the rules. These are the “untainted,” caught in the same sweep as those who bought their way in. The system, unable or unwilling to separate the honest from the dishonest, chose to level the field with a wrecking ball.
These teachers are not asking for miracles. They are asking for a fair hearing. For a process that distinguishes between guilt and innocence. For a release of records, answer sheets, and a transparent list that says who cheated and who didn’t. What they want isn’t privilege—it’s justice.
The response from officials has been silence coated in false promises. The Education Minister and the SSC leadership had pledged to release the necessary lists—names of the guilty, names of the innocent. That promise faded with the sun. In its place, there is unrest. Teachers have encircled the WBSSC office, refusing to let officials leave, even cutting off supplies, a desperate move by those who feel their voices no longer matter.
A thin sliver of relief was offered by the Court—some “untainted” high school teachers may retain their posts temporarily. But for the majority, this has only fueled confusion and deepened the wound. Who decides who is “untainted”? On what basis? Without explanation, this lifeline feels more like a game of chance than a path to justice.
Tomorrow, the teachers will march to the Governor’s House. This is not a protest in the usual sense. It’s a final cry for visibility, for dignity. Because this is no longer a case about employment—it’s about being wrongfully erased, their identities and integrity lumped into a scandal they never signed up for.
India has long held its teachers as beacons of knowledge, the very foundation of its aspirations. But today, the same nation watches silently as they are pushed into the shadows by the very system meant to protect them. This moment is more than a failure of governance; it’s a test of conscience.
If justice means anything, it must mean discernment. It must know how to punish without destroying the innocent. To pretend that a broken process invalidates honest effort is not justice—it’s laziness cloaked in legality. And if this laziness continues, the damage won’t end with these 26,000 teachers—it will echo in every classroom that now waits for a teacher who may never return.
It’s time for the state to do more than clean up corruption. It must also clean its conscience. Because the true measure of integrity is not just how a government handles the guilty—but how it honors the innocent.
Back Smoke Without Shelter: Murshidabad and the Cold Machinery of Abandonment
In the quiet recesses of West Bengal, where the Ganges once meandered past homes of harmony, Murshidabad now stands scorched by more than flames. The violence that erupted over the Waqf Act amendments didn’t merely demolish structures — it dislodged a community’s belief in the very system meant to shield it. What’s left behind is not just destruction, but despair: a gaping silence that speaks louder than the shouts of the mob.
The refugee camps — hastily thrown together, barely standing — are an insult to the word "shelter." These aren’t places of refuge, but reminders of systemic collapse. Infants go without food. Medicine is a luxury. And uncertainty is the only thing in abundance. Survivors say they feel like prisoners. But even prisons offer accountability, meals, a sense of time. These camps offer only waiting — and forgetting.
Yet the most terrifying part of this tragedy is not what was done by the enraged. It is what was not done by those in charge. Allegations abound: police officers allegedly pushing victims to return home prematurely, ferry routes cut off to prevent escape, cooks removed to weaken camp operations, and, worst of all, warnings to keep quiet. These are not failures of coordination — they are choices. And choices tell stories.
Still, amid this orchestrated neglect, the victims raise their voices. Not for charity, but for safety. Their demands are heartbreakingly simple: deploy the Border Security Force. Give us peace before politics. “We don’t want Lakshmir Bhandar, we want BSF camp,” reads one placard — not as protest, but as plea.
The women here suffer in silence that feels too heavy to bear. The National Commission for Women tried to document their pain, but some wounds resist articulation. Behind every quiet stare is a memory: of someone dragged away, someone not returning. It is not only grief that silences them — it is the fear that no one is listening.
Demands for a National Investigation Agency probe are gaining strength, and the Governor has offered hopeful words. But in the aftermath of violence, promises fall like dust — easy to scatter, hard to gather into action. The displaced don’t need investigations that vanish into files. They need follow-through.
This isn’t new. The region has long been a powder keg of unchecked extremism, border insecurities, and simmering communal strain. But time and again, we wait until the fire starts before noticing the smoke. Prevention in India is often reactive, not proactive. And empathy seems to arrive only once cameras do.
Mamata Banerjee has promised not to implement the Waqf changes in Bengal. She’s announced compensation, reconstruction, and investigations. But those living under leaking tarps have no appetite for political speeches. They want assurance they can sleep at night without clutching fear to their chest.
What’s unfolding in Murshidabad isn’t about one policy, one riot, or one district. It’s about a deeper fracture in how governance interacts with its most vulnerable. It raises uncomfortable questions: Are all citizens equal in the eyes of the state? Or does some grief receive more bandwidth than others?
Murshidabad doesn’t just need rebuilding — it needs reckoning. A democracy is not judged by how it treats its strongest, but how it protects its weakest. Right now, the weakest are crouched under plastic sheets, waiting for justice that moves slower than the monsoon.
Until their voices are heard — not as background noise but as the heart of the nation’s conscience — Murshidabad will not heal. The ashes may settle, but the smoke, if ignored, will rise again. And with it, our collective failure.
Back When the Gavel Met the Chalk: Lessons from the SSC Scandal in Bengal
The Supreme Court has stepped in once again on the West Bengal School Service Commission (SSC) recruitment scam, a case that has left thousands of careers in limbo and shaken the trust of an entire state. Although no new decision came on April 19, 2025, the Court’s order from April 17 still holds major implications, especially for schools, teachers, and students.
At the heart of this case is the 2016 SSC recruitment process, which was meant to fill positions for teachers and non-teaching staff in West Bengal schools. However, what should have been a routine hiring process turned into a massive scandal, with the Court declaring the entire recruitment drive deeply corrupt and beyond repair. Over 25,000 appointments were canceled as a result.
Despite the widespread irregularities, the Supreme Court made an important exception. Assistant teachers for Classes 9 to 12, who were found to be innocent and not involved in any wrongdoing, have been allowed to continue working—for now. The Court took this step to make sure students' education is not disrupted while the state tries to fix the broken system.
But this decision is not without conditions. The West Bengal government and the SSC have been told to begin a new recruitment process. They must publish advertisements for the vacant posts by May 31, 2025, and finish the hiring by December 31, 2025. If they fail to do so, even the currently allowed teachers may lose their jobs.
The situation is different for Group C and D employees, where the number of corrupt appointments was found to be much higher. These workers have not been given any relief. Those proven to be part of the scam will also have to return the salaries they earned during their illegal appointments.
This case shows that the Court is trying to strike a balance—it wants to clean up the mess but also protect the future of students who should not have to suffer because of a flawed system. The decision sends a strong message that while justice must be served, compassion has a place too.
Now, the responsibility lies with the West Bengal government. The Supreme Court has set clear deadlines and expectations. What happens next will show whether the state is ready to rebuild trust and put the interests of students first.
This is not just about jobs or rules. It’s about the values that shape our schools and the people who teach in them. The countdown has begun. Will the system learn its lesson this time?
Back A Law, A Protest, and a State Rocked by Violence
West Bengal has recently witnessed a troubling wave of violence, all sparked by the introduction of a law that many people believe threatens their rights. The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has sent a team to visit violence-hit areas of Bengal chiefly the worst affected regions of Murshidabad.
The unrest began after Parliament passed the WAQF Amendment Bill. This bill deals with properties donated for religious or charitable purposes, especially within the Muslim community. While the government claims the new law aims to improve transparency and regulation, many community members fear it gives the state too much control over lands they consider sacred.
Initially, people protested peacefully. They marched in the streets, hoping their voices would be heard. But things didn’t stay peaceful for long. In places like Bhangar and Dhuliyan, the situation turned violent. Clashes broke out between protestors and the police. There were incidents of stone-pelting, arson, and property destruction. In some parts of Murshidabad, schools had to be shut, shops closed, and curfews were enforced.
What’s alarming is how often similar incidents are happening across the country. Protests that start peacefully are too often turning into violent confrontations. This is not just about anger—it's also about how poorly the authorities handle rising tensions. A slow or unfair response can make things worse.
The NHRC’s visit is important, but it came after lives were already disrupted and properties damaged. The Commission can help by pointing out where human rights were violated, but it cannot undo the suffering already caused. Its role should serve as a reminder that strong, timely local governance is necessary to avoid such chaos in the first place.
If India wants to avoid repeating such tragedies, there needs to be a better way to introduce laws—especially ones that touch on religion or community rights. These topics need open conversations with the people they affect. Decisions should not be made without involving those who are directly impacted. Also, police and local officials need better training so they can respond with fairness and sensitivity.
What’s happening in West Bengal isn’t just a local issue. It shows a larger problem—a growing gap between the people and those in power. When people feel ignored or sidelined, their anger builds up. And when there’s no peaceful way to express it, it can lead to destruction.
In any democracy, protest is a right. But if leaders only react after violence begins, then the whole purpose of democracy is lost. The events in West Bengal are a warning. Unless leaders choose to listen, the silence they create might return as unrest—and next time, it might be even worse.
Real leadership isn’t about responding to the fire. It’s about listening before the first spark.
Back Shadows Over Murshidabad: When Anger Erupted and Silence Took Charge
Murshidabad has seen unrest before, but what happened in recent days has left scars deeper than anyone expected. What started as a protest against the newly introduced Waqf Amendment Bill quickly spiraled into something far more dangerous—a wave of violence that shook entire communities and exposed troubling cracks in the system meant to protect them.
The demonstrations, meant to be peaceful, turned into terrifying scenes of mob aggression. Groups of people stormed the streets, setting police vehicles on fire, destroying shops, and breaking into homes. Stone-pelting was rampant. Bricks flew through windows and crashed into living rooms. In many cases, mobs forced their way inside, destroying furniture, looting belongings, and leaving nothing untouched. Families who had lived peacefully for generations suddenly found themselves running for safety, unsure if they'd have a home to return to.
But the real tragedy wasn’t just the destruction—it was the silence. Residents say police arrived late and were outnumbered when they did. Some officers were attacked. Many locals believe the situation could have been brought under control earlier if the response had been quicker and stronger. For those affected, it felt like the authorities had abandoned them at a time when they needed help the most.
In response to the worsening crisis, the Calcutta High Court stepped in. A special bench was created, and orders were issued to deploy central forces to work alongside the state police. While officials claimed that peace was being restored, many on the ground told a different story. Their lives were still filled with fear. Their homes, once safe and familiar, had become sites of trauma.
There are growing concerns that the violence may not have been entirely local. A senior government official hinted that external elements might have played a role in stirring up the chaos. If true, that raises serious questions about who is pulling the strings behind such unrest—and why. Meanwhile, political blame is flying in every direction. Even a legislator from the ruling Trinamool Congress criticized the government’s handling of the events, an unusual public admission of failure from within the establishment.
Lost in the noise of political statements and official reports are the real stories—the families sweeping debris out of their homes, the children afraid to sleep at night, the shopkeepers staring at empty, charred storefronts where their livelihoods once thrived. For them, it’s not about who wins the debate on TV. It’s about survival. It’s about justice. And most of all, it’s about knowing that someone in power is listening—and acting.
The violence in Murshidabad wasn’t just a security lapse. It was a moment that revealed just how fragile trust in the system has become. The state must now do more than just restore order—it must restore faith. That means holding the perpetrators accountable, no matter who they are or where they come from. It means ensuring that such violence can never take root again.
This wasn’t just a protest gone wrong. It was a wake-up call. A reminder that in the absence of swift action and clear leadership, fear takes over. Murshidabad cried out for protection—and the silence in response may echo for years if the lessons of this moment are not taken seriously.
Back |
